In Pursuit Of Truth: When Fiction Masquerades As Facts

UntitledWho can you trust when movie producers masquerade fiction as truth? I recently remembered having read a story somewhere about US soldiers who had rebelled against orders to “dispose” of their horses as the US army became mechanized, driving them instead North towards Canada.

For the life of me I could not remember where I had read this, but I found the subject intriguing as well as disturbing, being a horseman myself, so I started searching the Internet. I eventually stumbled upon references to a movie made for TV by HBO back in 1995, In Pursuit of Honor, which I was able to order from Amazon.

  • Directed by Ken Olin
  • Produced by Anne Hopkins
  • Written by Dennis Lynton Clark
  • Starring: Don Johnson, Craig Sheffer, Gabrielle Anwar, Bob Gunton, and Rod Steiger
  • Distributed by HBO Pictures
  • Released March 18, 1995
  • Running time: 89 Min. (TV) 109 Min. (DVD)
  • Country: U.S.
 (Filmed in Australia)
  • Language: English

The movie stars Craig Sheffer as a young lieutenant in the 12th Cavalry Regiment who buckles at orders from the War Department to have 500 remounts (extra horses) “disposed of” (i.e. machined-gunned in a pit somewhere in Mexico) as a cost-saving measure as the army is being mechanized. After witnessing the massacre of the first 100 horses, the young lieutenant decides to save the remaining 400 or so. Enlisting the help of three old-time sergeants, including the lead played by Don Johnson, he embarks on a 2000-mile journey North to eventually lead the surviving horses across the Canadian border, all the while being pursued by a mechanized and mounted force trying to stop them.

Bonus_March

Bonus Marchers, 1932. US National Archives.

The movie starts with a claim that it is “based upon a true story”. It does open on a true event with actual footage of a 1932 rally held in Washington by World War I veterans claiming overdue war bonuses, an event known as the “Bonus March”[i]. But contrary to what viewers are thus led to believe, pretty much everything else is pure fiction from that point on, although it took me some additional research to find that out.

The evidence is actually scarce, but I did find a very enlightening post published in 2008 on Military History Online[ii]. Written by Bob Seals, a retired Army Special Forces Officer, this piece contains multiple references to back up its claims that this movie is entirely fictitious, aside from the opening sequence about the “Bonus March”, and the fact that the U.S. Cavalry did turn in their sabers in 1934.

cavalry1935

Fifth Cavalry Regiment Cavalrymen and their Mounts, Camp Pine, NY 1935

However, Seals contends that the historical evidence supporting the main events portrayed in this movie consists of: “one, the total lack of any documenting records from numerous organizations; two, the regulations, policies and procedures dealing with public animals, to include horses and mules, strictly regulating use; three, the intrinsic value of horses at the time; and finally, the Army Officers code of conduct itself. Weighed in their entirety it seems rather obvious that such a disgraceful episode did not take place.”

Seals also notes that he found no orders or facts in the U.S. Army Center of Military Records regarding “a 1934 incident involving the Chief of Staff ordering cavalry remounts being destroyed or a herd driven from Mexico to Canada in order to prevent their destruction.” He also indicates that the 12th Cavalry Regiment, the 1st Cavalry Division, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police have no record of such an incident ever having taken place.

Seals further adds that “The Quartermaster Corps Army Regulations[iii] of the prewar era were very specific about the inspection, registration, branding, disposition, destruction and sale of any public animal, to include horses or mules. Registration cards had to be maintained for each animal, with the original sent to an animal register maintained by the Quartermaster General. Officers had to witness the destruction or sale of animals and certify the same with appropriate reports filed.”[iv]

An earlier post published in 2002 by Pat Holscher on the Society of the Military Horse website further indicates that the US Army was not in the process of dismounting its cavalry in the period covered by this film. “The Army actually continued to operate a Remount service, and acquire mounts, well into World War II, and it continued to train cavalrymen at least up in to 1944,” says Holscher. “Horse cavalry is typically regarded as having been dismounted in 1943, but the actual paper end came after WWII, not before.”[v]

Holscher further adds that the army never did machine-gun surplus mounts: “When the end finally came, the Remount operations were turned over to the Department of Agriculture, and horses transferred accordingly, many into private hands.”

I recommend reading this post in its entirety for it contains additional and very interesting information regarding events portrayed in this movie, such as the concept of a mounted race across a western unpopulated wilderness in the 1930’s.

As Holscher notes, “nothing in this film is factual, but the appealing visual quality it possesses continues to draw new viewers” – which is why I am publishing this post in the hope that it will help some of them sift truth from fiction…

Henri Thibodeau Galloping Horse Henri’s Web Space


Update, August 28, 2016

For some reason which escapes me, this article I posted almost 3 years ago and which was among my earliest posts remains among the most popular on Henri’s Web Space. It has generated numerous comments, not all of which were fit to publish, but no one so far has been able to provide me with any credible evidence that the events portrayed in this movie did actually take place – however, doubts linger, and I am still in pursuit of truth… If you are aware of any verifiable evidence that these events did actually take place, please let me know and I will update this article accordingly.

In the meantime, I guess we should all beware of anything that comes out of the Hollywood movie factories. More and more evidence is surfacing indicatingThe CIA in Hollywood that the CIA and other branches of the U.S. Federal apparatus, such as the U.S. Army,  play an important role in “massaging the messages” indented for public consumption.

In her book The CIA in Hollywood: How the Agency Shapes Film and Television, author Tricia Jenkins offers a full-scale investigation of the relationship between the Agency and the film and television industries. We can read on Amazon that “her research reveals the significant influence that the CIA now wields in Hollywood and raises important and troubling questions about the ethics and legality of a government agency using popular media to manipulate its public image.” – HT

Follow-up article published September 8, 2016
Still in pursuit of truth: discerning fact from fiction is an ongoing process..

Footnotes

[i] Wikipedia, Bonus Army.

[ii] Bob Seals, 2008, In Defense of Honor: General Douglas MacArthur and the Horse Cavalry of 1934.

[iii] The procurement and training of horses and mules for military use was the function of the Quartermaster Corps from 1775 to 1957US Army Quartermaster Foundation.

[iv] As quoted by Seals: Army Regulations 30-455 and 880-5. As per the Quartermaster Corps Museum both regulations, with few changes, were in effect throughout the 1930’s.

[v] ‪Pat Holscher, In Pursuit of Honor, June 13, 2002; Society of the Military Horse.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Our Occulted History and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to In Pursuit Of Truth: When Fiction Masquerades As Facts

  1. Colin R. Coster says:

    I thought it was a wonderful movie, whether true or not, and I was amused to see it was shot in Australia—no wonder it looked familiar— as I live there! As to the truth of the matter, I think the US Army regulations and ordinances quoted in the article make it clear that the treatment of horses was intended to be far more humane than was shown in the movie.

    Like

  2. Raymond says:

    Stories told by locals along the route and retired soldiers would give this story credibility. It would be interesting to know if there are any. Was the story made up or was it based on people who witnessed some of the events? Good imagination if someone made it up.

    Like

  3. Michael C Borg says:

    I know this is based on a true story because when I was a child, back in the early 70’s, my Great Uncle (not posting his name because I have not talked to the rest of the family) told me about how he wound up in Leavenworth for saving the horses from being shot. It was a great story, but he was one of the men that drove the horses to Canada. I wish he was still with us so I could get the real story.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Wendy Esparza says:

    If there is one thing I have learned in life, it is that there are many things that we the people do not know in regards to what our government/military have done in the past. If there were no written orders than who is it say that this didn’t take place? I think that it is prudent to have an open mind when it comes to these kinds of stories, however the media should be far more careful how they tag stories like this.

    Like

  5. William James says:

    I read Bob Seals’ long winded diatribe written to “protect the honor of Gen. D. MacArthur”; and, all it says is there is no official record of MacArthur and the U. S. Army committing this dastardly and illegal act. Therefore, if there is no official record, it didn’t happen. A pretty weak effort on Mr. Seal’s part. l don’t know if it did or did not happen … but, the scenario sounds possible to me. Given that this alleged illegal and immoral event is now 80 years in the past, it is difficult to find out the truth. But the lack of official records is no defense at all to the charges brought up by this story.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I tend to agree with you, William; I could not find anything on the Internet when I wrote this story (almost 3 years ago) that supported the claims made in the film, but then again, I would not put such a barbarous act beyond the US Army/Government, which is probably what makes this movie so compelling in its own right.

      Like

  6. Bentz says:

    Bastard, I really love that movie, I thought it was real.

    The producer must go to jail!

    Thanks for this info!

    Like

Leave a Reply | Laissez un commentaire

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s